Blog

Medical Devices

view all

Auto Accidents

view all

Labor Law

view all

FDA and Prescription Drugs

view all

Products Liability

view all

Medical Malpractice

view all

Wrongful Death

view all

Personal Injury

view all

Trasylol

view all

General

view all

News

view all

Library

FDA and Prescription Drugs

Recruiting

Newsletter

General


Napoli Bern Ripka, LLP Blog

Napoli Bern Ripka, LLP Blog
Blog Category:
7/7/2008
Paul Napoli
Comments (0)

Lead Paint Ruling Overturned: Product Liability at Issue

The product that caused more than 30,000 children to be poisoned is a lead based paint manufactured by Sherwin-Williams Company, NL Industries, and Millennium Holdings. In this product liability case, the three companies were subject to pay billions of dollars to clean up contaminated paint around the state. However the companies had asked the Rhode Island Supreme Court to overturn a jury verdict of Feb. 22, 2006. On Tuesday, the court did just that. The Rhode Island’s top court overturned the landmark decision holding the companies not liable.



The lead in paint is added


to speed drying, increase durability, retain a fresh appearance, and resist moisture that causes corrosion. Paint with significant lead content is still used in industry and by the military. Although lead improves paint performance, it is a dangerous substance. It is especially damaging to children under age six whose bodies are still developing. Lead causes nervous system damage, hearing loss, stunted growth, and delayed development. It can cause kidney damage and affects every organ system of the body. It also is dangerous to adults, and can cause reproductive problems for both men and women.


It all started about 10 years ago in which the case was the first in the country seeking to hold pain makers responsible. The reason why this case is such a big deal is because Rhode Island’s decision could influence court decisions in other states, counties and cities where lead-poisoning lawsuits are pending. The lead paint case had drawn comparisons to the tobacco lawsuits that ultimately led to a settlement that cost cigarette makers more than $200 billion. The Rhode Island Supreme Court said the state failed to "establish that defendants interfered with a public right or that defendants were in control of the lead pigment they, or their predecessors, manufactured at the time it caused harm to Rhode Island children."


The three companies made their product available to the public and thus are held responsible for the injuries that the lead pain caused. However, a products liability claim is based on the following causes of action: design defect, manufacturing defect, & failure to warn. It is often hard to prove negligence in product liability cases due to the fact that manufacturers must only show that "ordinary care under the circumstances" was applied to avoid liability for negligence.



Although, the decision was overturned and the paint manufacturers are not liable, who is? What happens to the victims that were exposed to the toxic paint? Napoli Bern Ripka is a premiere personal injury firm having over 60 years of experience combined. Paul J Napoli and Marc J Bern are Super Lawyers, Members of Law Dragon which represent top performing lawyers.


They have access to the top resources needed to get the settlement you deserve, not what is offered.


For the full article on the landmark decision click here

 


 




Comments

There are no comments.

Post a comment

Post a Comment to "Lead Paint Ruling Overturned: Product Liability at Issue"

To reply to this message, enter your reply in the box labeled "Message", enter your username and password, and hit "Post Message."

Username:

Password:

Register for an account

Message: