
The product that caused more than 30,000 children to be poisoned is a lead based paint manufactured by Sherwin-Williams Company, NL Industries, and Millennium Holdings. In this product liability case, the three companies were subject to pay billions of dollars to clean up contaminated paint around the state. However the companies had asked the Rhode Island Supreme Court to overturn a jury verdict of Feb. 22, 2006. On Tuesday, the court did just that. The Rhode Island’s top court overturned the landmark decision holding the companies not liable.
The lead in paint is added
to speed drying, increase durability, retain a fresh appearance, and resist moisture that causes corrosion. Paint with significant lead content is still used in industry and by the military. Although lead improves paint performance, it is a dangerous substance. It is especially damaging to children under age six whose bodies are still developing. Lead causes nervous system damage, hearing loss, stunted growth, and delayed development. It can cause kidney damage and affects every organ system of the body. It also is dangerous to adults, and can cause reproductive problems for both men and women.
It all started about 10 years ago in which the case was the first in the country seeking to hold pain makers responsible. The reason why this case is such a big deal is because Rhode Island’s decision could influence court decisions in other states, counties and cities where lead-poisoning lawsuits are pending. The lead paint case had drawn comparisons to the tobacco lawsuits that ultimately led to a settlement that cost cigarette makers more than $200 billion. The Rhode Island Supreme Court said the state failed to "establish that defendants interfered with a public right or that defendants were in control of the lead pigment they, or their predecessors, manufactured at the time it caused harm to Rhode Island children."
The three companies made their product available to the public and thus are held responsible for the injuries that the lead pain caused. However, a products liability claim is based on the following causes of action: design defect, manufacturing defect, & failure to warn. It is often hard to prove negligence in product liability cases due to the fact that manufacturers must only show that "ordinary care under the circumstances" was applied to avoid liability for negligence.
Although, the decision was overturned and the paint manufacturers are not liable, who is? What happens to the victims that were exposed to the toxic paint? Napoli Bern Ripka is a premiere personal injury firm having over 60 years of experience combined. Paul J Napoli and Marc J Bern are Super Lawyers, Members of Law Dragon which represent top performing lawyers.
They have access to the top resources needed to get the settlement you deserve, not what is offered.
For the full article on the landmark decision click here
Post a Comment to "Lead Paint Ruling Overturned: Product Liability at Issue"
To reply to this message, enter your reply in the box labeled "Message", enter your username and password, and hit "Post Message."
Napoli Bern LLP
350 5th Avenue
Suite 7413
New York, NY 10118
Toll Free: 877 WTC HERO
Phone: 212 267 3700
Napoli Bern LLP
350 5th Avenue, Suite 7413,
New York, NY 10118
Toll Free: 1 888 LAW IN NY
Phone: 212 267 3700
New Jersey
1 Greentree Centre
Suite 201
Marlton, NJ 08053
New York
350 5th Avenue,
Suite 7413,
New York, NY 10118
3500 Sunrise Highway,
Suite T-207
Great River, NY 11739
Pennsylvania
2 Penn Center, Suite 200
Philadelphia, PA 19102
New York Defective Drugs and Medical Devices Lawyers
New York Auto Accident Lawyers
New York Construction and Jobsite Accident Lawyers
Marc Bern discusses the Diet Drug FenPhen on Geraldo
Marc Bern on CourtTV discussing Fen-Phen
Marc Bern is on Geraldo discussing the diet drug Fen-Phen
Trial Attorney Marc Bern discusses Breast Implants on Court TV
Marc Bern on CourtTV discussing breast implant litigation
Nancy Grace with Marc Bern about Jenny Jones Trial
New York Trial Attorney Marc Bern on Court TV