You are here:

Frequently Asked Questions of a Medical Malpractice Lawyer

Frequently Asked Questions of a Medical Malpractice Lawyer

What is Medical Malpractice?

Medical malpractice is professional negligence by a health care provider in which the care provided does not meet a certain standard of care, defined by what other health care providers with similar training and experience would do if faced with the same or similar situation, resulting in injury or death of the patient.

Is there a time-period in which I must file a medical malpractice lawsuit?

Yes, called the Statute of Limitations, this defines the maximum time after an event that a plaintiff may bring legal proceedings based on that event. Therefore, it is important to seek the advice of a medical malpractice lawyer as soon as you suspect you are a victim.

What kinds of damages can I recover from my medical malpractice lawsuit?

Damages you may recover vary by state and can include compensation for pain and suffering, medical expenses and loss of income.

Who can be held responsible for medical malpractice?

If varies by state, but usually any medical care provider including individuals such as doctors, nurses, dentists, pharmacists and entities such as hospitals, corporations, professional organizations and partnerships.

Have I waived my right to file a medical malpractice lawsuit because I signed a consent form?

A consent form acknowledges that you understand certain risks associated with a treatment or procedure, it does not relieve the doctor or hospital of the duty to provide a certain standard of care or prevent you from filing a medical malpractice lawsuit if they fail to provide that care.

Do I have grounds for a medical malpractice lawsuit?

You should discuss your specific situation with a medical malpractice lawyer. Only an experienced medical malpractice lawyer can determine if you have a reason to file a medical malpractice lawsuit, call the medical malpractice attorneys of Napoli Bern Ripka LLP.

Verdicts about About Auto Accident Lawsuits

Cases and Settlements of Note

Medical Malpractice Lawsuits & Settlements

  • Badolato v. Rosenberg.   The Second Department affirmed the trial court’s denial of summary judgment to chiropractor, holding that a physician retained to perform a physical examination for Workers Compensation or Disability purposes can be held liable for medical malpractice where the physician affirmatively interferes with the patient’s treatment to his detriment.
  • Selva v. Lillie.  The court affirmed a denial of summary judgment to general practitioner who claimed that her failure to refer a patient suffering neurological disorder that rendered him quadriplegic for specialist consult was not a departure from good medical practice because she did not have the neurological expertise to recognize that the patient was suffering from a systemic neurological disorder rather than a herniated lumbar disc.

 

  • Graham v. Mitchell.  The appellate court reversed the trial court’s order granting summary judgment on a catastrophically brain-damaged infant claim and reinstated the plaintiffs’ complaint.
  • Raciti v. Sands Point Nursing Home, et al., 54 A.D.3d 1014 (2d Dept’ 2008), reversing dismissal of plaintiff’s complaint by the trial court which abused its discretion in refusing to consider plaintiffs’ opposition and cross motion, delivered late to court due to interruption of transit service in a torrential rainstorm. 
  • Buckley v. Charles K. Goldner, LLC, Abranham Colton. The firm represented Buckley who was a guest in the building, who leaned against an elevator door, believing it to lead to laundry facilities.  The elevator door swung open from below, and Buckley fell down the shaft, breaking part of his spine, tearing his urethra, and dislocating his shoulder. The Verdict of $1.9M was awarded in May 2010.
  • Jermaine Rhoden v. NYC Transit Authority et al.  The firm represented Rhoden who was bicycling on White Plains Road when he attempted to pass between a parked vehicle and a public bus.  Rhoden became wedged between the bus and vehicle, and injured his knee, which required knee surgery to fix. A verdict of $550,000 was awarded in September 2009.

Attention Lawyers
Lawyer affiliations
Attorney Advertising: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. This website is for informational purposes only, does not constitute legal advice and may not reflect the most current legal developments. Use of this website does not create an attorney-client relationship, only a written contract between the parties can establish an attorney-client relationship. Napoli Bern Ripka Shkolnik LLP and all contributing authors expressly disclaim all liability to any person with respect to the contents of this website. Imagery used on this website utilizes fictionalized events or scenes with participation of models. For complete details, read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Super Lawyer Mark Bern
(888) 529 4669
Lawyers for Birth Injury
Napoli Bern Ripka, LLP
 
Call Our Law Firm
1 (888) 529 4669
Home | Locations

I have read the disclaimer

Join our Mailing List